<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let Me Teach You Why Greenwashing is Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2009/12/01/let-me-teach-you-why-greenwashing-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2009/12/01/let-me-teach-you-why-greenwashing-is-good/</link>
	<description>All Things Boston + Clean Tech + Innovation. Events, Resources, Industry Insiders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Williams</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2009/12/01/let-me-teach-you-why-greenwashing-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=140#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Jesse, I agree. The issue is whether a backlash will be strong enough to overcome the amount of grenwashing happening. I recently read that a survey of 2,000 found that 95% were greenwashing. This does display the magnitude of the problem but I would argued the survey didn&#039;t have much mean because I&#039;m assuming that didn&#039;t have a standard definition of what green is. This is the central problem that most hippies/liberals, whatever you want to call them have failed to address. They describe when it&#039;s NOT green but not what IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, I agree. The issue is whether a backlash will be strong enough to overcome the amount of grenwashing happening. I recently read that a survey of 2,000 found that 95% were greenwashing. This does display the magnitude of the problem but I would argued the survey didn&#8217;t have much mean because I&#8217;m assuming that didn&#8217;t have a standard definition of what green is. This is the central problem that most hippies/liberals, whatever you want to call them have failed to address. They describe when it&#8217;s NOT green but not what IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Tolz</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2009/12/01/let-me-teach-you-why-greenwashing-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Tolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=140#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that you have realized there is some positive drive behind the undistinguished term &quot;green.&quot; I have also seen it as a fashionable cool with which people like to pride themselves among their networks, and much like you stated in this post, let&#039;s harness people wanting to represent their green-ness in the most optimal manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that you have realized there is some positive drive behind the undistinguished term &#8220;green.&#8221; I have also seen it as a fashionable cool with which people like to pride themselves among their networks, and much like you stated in this post, let&#8217;s harness people wanting to represent their green-ness in the most optimal manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
