<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s your Opinion? Green Tech VS. Clean Tech VS. &#8216;EnerTech&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/</link>
	<description>All Things Boston + Clean Tech + Innovation. Events, Resources, Industry Insiders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SURVEY: What do you Want to Know about Cleantech in Boston? — The Green Light Distrikt</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>SURVEY: What do you Want to Know about Cleantech in Boston? — The Green Light Distrikt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] Green Tech Vs. Clean Tech. Vs Ener Tech post received some great retweeting and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Green Tech Vs. Clean Tech. Vs Ener Tech post received some great retweeting and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Williams</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Wow! I love all these comments and they&#039;re all interesting perspective into the use of the word which seems trivial but I think is really important for the movement to have a clear definition. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Green Tech - I agree, the polarizing aspect, although can be negative surely does separate it from everything else and describes what it is trying to achieve. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bernadette -  I think that the use of the word clean has more implications other then energy is precisely WHY it&#039;s so valuable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt (Clean Tech Boston) - Thank you for your comment. I think the amount of green washing that has gone on has put a sour taste in my mouth as well. Personally, I don&#039;t really use the word at all anymore!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Martin - That&#039;s a very interesting point of view, the difference between the use of words between the general public and investors. Now that I think about it, that&#039;s completely true. I agree, it doesn&#039;t seem like there is a current distinction between green tech and clean tech but I wonder if one will form in the near future. What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I love all these comments and they&#39;re all interesting perspective into the use of the word which seems trivial but I think is really important for the movement to have a clear definition. </p>
<p>Green Tech &#8211; I agree, the polarizing aspect, although can be negative surely does separate it from everything else and describes what it is trying to achieve. </p>
<p>Bernadette &#8211;  I think that the use of the word clean has more implications other then energy is precisely WHY it&#39;s so valuable. </p>
<p>Matt (Clean Tech Boston) &#8211; Thank you for your comment. I think the amount of green washing that has gone on has put a sour taste in my mouth as well. Personally, I don&#39;t really use the word at all anymore!</p>
<p>Martin &#8211; That&#39;s a very interesting point of view, the difference between the use of words between the general public and investors. Now that I think about it, that&#39;s completely true. I agree, it doesn&#39;t seem like there is a current distinction between green tech and clean tech but I wonder if one will form in the near future. What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Williams</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Wow! I love all these comments and they&#039;re all interesting perspective into the use of the word which seems trivial but I think is really important for the movement to have a clear definition. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Green Tech - I agree, the polarizing aspect, although can be negative surely does separate it from everything else and describes what it is trying to achieve. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bernadette -  I think that the use of the word clean has more implications other then energy is precisely WHY it&#039;s so valuable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matt (Clean Tech Boston) - Thank you for your comment. I think the amount of green washing that has gone on has put a sour taste in my mouth as well. Personally, I don&#039;t really use the word at all anymore!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Martin - That&#039;s a very interesting point of view, the difference between the use of words between the general public and investors. Now that I think about it, that&#039;s completely true. I agree, it doesn&#039;t seem like there is a current distinction between green tech and clean tech but I wonder if one will form in the near future. What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I love all these comments and they&#39;re all interesting perspective into the use of the word which seems trivial but I think is really important for the movement to have a clear definition. </p>
<p>Green Tech &#8211; I agree, the polarizing aspect, although can be negative surely does separate it from everything else and describes what it is trying to achieve. </p>
<p>Bernadette &#8211;  I think that the use of the word clean has more implications other then energy is precisely WHY it&#39;s so valuable. </p>
<p>Matt (Clean Tech Boston) &#8211; Thank you for your comment. I think the amount of green washing that has gone on has put a sour taste in my mouth as well. Personally, I don&#39;t really use the word at all anymore!</p>
<p>Martin &#8211; That&#39;s a very interesting point of view, the difference between the use of words between the general public and investors. Now that I think about it, that&#39;s completely true. I agree, it doesn&#39;t seem like there is a current distinction between green tech and clean tech but I wonder if one will form in the near future. What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinlamonica</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>martinlamonica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-73</guid>
		<description>EnerTech is limited because it doesn&#039;t address water or materials. Investors tend to talk about the clean tech category but I think the general populace is more familiar with the term green technologies. I don&#039;t distinguish between them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EnerTech is limited because it doesn&#39;t address water or materials. Investors tend to talk about the clean tech category but I think the general populace is more familiar with the term green technologies. I don&#39;t distinguish between them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernadette</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernadette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-72</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t have a great deal of knowledge about the current happenings in the &quot;green&quot; or &quot;clean&quot; tech industry, from a consumer point of view and from someone who is aware of the global environmental issues we are facing, I feel that enertech as a term is unclear. At the same time you indicate the clean has applications beyond just energy, I agree, but is that a bad thing? There are many practices across industries that need improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#39;t have a great deal of knowledge about the current happenings in the &#8220;green&#8221; or &#8220;clean&#8221; tech industry, from a consumer point of view and from someone who is aware of the global environmental issues we are facing, I feel that enertech as a term is unclear. At the same time you indicate the clean has applications beyond just energy, I agree, but is that a bad thing? There are many practices across industries that need improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleantechboston</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>cleantechboston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I tend to use &quot;Clean&quot; for CleanTech (and as a side note, what is the consensus on whether this word should be one word or two?) rather than Green.  And, I much prefer either to &quot;EnerTech.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the green vs. clean issue, I fall on the side of clean more because to me clean implies the goal of the technology more than green does.  Perhaps it is because of the bucket loads of greenwashing that have taken place over the last two years by major corporations/industries, but to me CleanTech is anything that is working towards a cleaner future.  This can range from renewable energy sources to new types of water filtration systems, to energy storage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both Green and Clean beat Ener for me hands down at this point -- I think it is too late to change the vernacular.  Just as this topic has become front-of-mind for many, &quot;EnerTech&quot; doesn&#039;t evoke anything.  It doesn&#039;t draw a picture in the mind of what it actually is or what it may be.  While it alludes to energy, that connection isn&#039;t necessarily immediately obvious. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Until there is a susinct definition of what green/clean technology encompasses and what it doesn&#039;t there wil be many different ways of referencing the same things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to use &#8220;Clean&#8221; for CleanTech (and as a side note, what is the consensus on whether this word should be one word or two?) rather than Green.  And, I much prefer either to &#8220;EnerTech.&#8221; </p>
<p>For the green vs. clean issue, I fall on the side of clean more because to me clean implies the goal of the technology more than green does.  Perhaps it is because of the bucket loads of greenwashing that have taken place over the last two years by major corporations/industries, but to me CleanTech is anything that is working towards a cleaner future.  This can range from renewable energy sources to new types of water filtration systems, to energy storage.</p>
<p>Both Green and Clean beat Ener for me hands down at this point &#8212; I think it is too late to change the vernacular.  Just as this topic has become front-of-mind for many, &#8220;EnerTech&#8221; doesn&#39;t evoke anything.  It doesn&#39;t draw a picture in the mind of what it actually is or what it may be.  While it alludes to energy, that connection isn&#39;t necessarily immediately obvious. </p>
<p>Until there is a susinct definition of what green/clean technology encompasses and what it doesn&#39;t there wil be many different ways of referencing the same things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention What’s your Opinion? Green Tech VS. Clean Tech VS. ‘EnerTech’? — The Green Light Distrikt -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What’s your Opinion? Green Tech VS. Clean Tech VS. ‘EnerTech’? — The Green Light Distrikt -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AltEnergy Randy C, Christopher Williams. Christopher Williams said: RT @GreenLDistrikt: What&#039;s your Opinion? Green Tech VS Clean Tech VS &#039;EnerTech? http://bit.ly/5Y7J4b [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AltEnergy Randy C, Christopher Williams. Christopher Williams said: RT @GreenLDistrikt: What&#39;s your Opinion? Green Tech VS Clean Tech VS &#39;EnerTech? <a href="http://bit.ly/5Y7J4b">http://bit.ly/5Y7J4b</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greentech Media</title>
		<link>http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/2010/01/22/whats-your-opinion-green-tech-vs-clean-tech-vs-enertech/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Greentech Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenlightdistrikt.com/?p=489#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Coming from Greentech Media - as we use it, &quot;green&quot; tech refers to technology in the renewable energy fields, including generation, distribution and consumption. While I agree that the polarizing concept of &quot;Green&quot; can be a negative, but I also think that these technologies do need to be differentiated from the traditional sources through their connection to the planet and their natural sources. It&#039;s a fine line, I agree, and I certainly never would disagree with someone using &quot;clean&quot; or &quot;ener&quot;. However, for now I still think that Green is the most accurate description of the kind of technology that we cover. And trust me - from the number of calls we get from people wanting us to use their bamboo plant or solar powered calculator, I know that some people don&#039;t realize we&#039;re a b-to-b media resource vs. a green promoter, but we&#039;re working on getting the word out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming from Greentech Media &#8211; as we use it, &#8220;green&#8221; tech refers to technology in the renewable energy fields, including generation, distribution and consumption. While I agree that the polarizing concept of &#8220;Green&#8221; can be a negative, but I also think that these technologies do need to be differentiated from the traditional sources through their connection to the planet and their natural sources. It&#39;s a fine line, I agree, and I certainly never would disagree with someone using &#8220;clean&#8221; or &#8220;ener&#8221;. However, for now I still think that Green is the most accurate description of the kind of technology that we cover. And trust me &#8211; from the number of calls we get from people wanting us to use their bamboo plant or solar powered calculator, I know that some people don&#39;t realize we&#39;re a b-to-b media resource vs. a green promoter, but we&#39;re working on getting the word out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
