Green Light Distrikt is about entrepreneurship focused on the cleantech sector. GLD U provides cleantech courses . Edited by Chris Williams with frequent guest posts from friends, experts and industry insiders from clusters across the globe. Our goal is to provide a place where cleantech entrepreneurs in various clusters across the globe can learn from one another. Green Light Distrikt is creating the "Hitchikers Guide to Clentech" to provide a resource for cleantech entrepreneurs. Read more
- The Worst Metric in Renewables: ‘Payback Period’
- "Solar, Inc." and the Balance of Values
- Top 10 Boston Clean Tech Companies Killing It on Twitter
- Good News For Job Seekers! Mass Solar Industry to Grow 30% per year
- VOTE: Boston's Top 26
- What’s your Opinion? Green Tech VS. Clean Tech VS. ‘EnerTech’?
- What’s Better? Climate Change OR Climate Disruption
- BICEP (3)
- Business Insights (10)
- CleanTech Events (10)
- CleanTech Guide (8)
- CleanTech Kingpins (9)
- EnergyBar (2)
- Entrepreneurship (26)
- For College Students (1)
- GLD U (1)
- Government Policy (33)
- Green Building (7)
- Hitch Hikers Guide to Cleantech (1)
- Industry Insiders (5)
$100 Discounts for Basic Technical TrainingBasic technical training is key for anyone interested in the renewable energy industry. Use the code "GLD" to get discounts from any of the below trainings.
- NABCEP Solar Training Boston This training course is made for people who are new to solar. You’ll learn how to design a solar PV array from a to z, how to quote a project, the installation process, and solar code.
- Solar Sales Training Learn how to sell solar from an expert, Keith Cronin. Keith build and sold his solar company to SunEdison. Keith knows how to sell jobs profitably.
- IGSHPA Geothermal Training The IGSHPA certification is the standard in the industry. In this training, you’ll learn how to design and quote residential and light commercial projects by 1) determining building loading 2) sizing equipment 3) sizing the group loop 4) sizing the distribution system and controls 5) and what sort of equipment so spec in each of the prior steps.
- NABCEP Solar Thermal Training Boot Camp: The solar thermal boot camp is similar to the PV boot camp, but just that it’s based on solar thermal systems.
- Selling Clean Energy to the Government The federal government, and specifically the military, has become the largest single renewable energy customer in the US with a goal of 3GW of installed capacity, among various technologies, by 202.
Other Free ResourcesFree NABCEP Study Guide If you’re studying for the NABCEP Solar PV installer or just want an in-depth review of solar basics this will be a good resource for you. If you want to buy the full guide, you can find it here NABCEP Study Guide.
Solar Reading List 101 A useful list of free article on solar sales, marketing, design, installation, policy and finance.
Geothermal Reading List 101 A useful life of free articles on solar sales, marketing, design, installation of projects.
Click here to learn what is NABCEP and wether or not you should need to get the certification. If you're serious about the solar industry and you want to get the NABCEP Certification, but you need to understand how exactly to apply, you can read more about getting the NABCEP Certification here.
Good Resources on Renewable Energy in Maine
October 25th, 2010
Virtually everyone who studies climate and energy issues agrees that federal energy R&D is woefully underfunded. So why did a recent white paper recommending an increased emphasis on energy innovation and R&D, by scholars at three think tanks representing a range of ideologies, provoke significant criticism from a number of clean energy advocates?
“Post-Partisan Power”, written jointly by scholars at Brookings, AEI, and the Breakthrough Institute was criticized by a range of analysts, including CAP’s Joe Romm, Grist’s David Roberts, CFR’s Michael Levi and Harvard’s Rob Stavins (in addition to a plenty of favorable reactions.)
Much of the criticism centered less around its substance than on the perception that the paper promoted its recommendations as a viable alternative to a price on carbon. The very title of the paper claims its approach can “deliver clean, cheap energy, economic productivity and national prosperity”, however I invite you to decide for yourself whether it frames itself as a comprehensive alternative.
This recent back-and-forth takes place in the context of an ongoing debate over the relative merits of R&D and technological innovation vs. carbon pricing and deployment of existing technologies (in which the Breakthrough Institute figures prominently). Plenty of commentators have weighed in (including Bill Gates), and there are lots of interesting sub-issues to consider. (My personal favorite is the value of deployment in the innovation process.)
Yet, this ongoing debate obscures substantial agreement between parties. There is a basic consensus amongst academics and policy analysts that addressing our climate and energy challenges will require both increased R&D and a price on carbon. Ours is both a technological challenge and a deployment challenge.
Harvard’s Rob Stavins, one of the foremost intellectuals in the climate policy field sums this up nicely:
It has long been recognized that although carbon-pricing will be necessary, it will not be sufficient. Economists and other policy analysts have noted that policies intended to foster climate-friendly technology research and development (R&D) will also be necessary, but likewise will not be sufficient on their own.
Carbon pricing and R&D are well understood to be complementary. For one thing, a price on carbon would have substantial impact on the pace of technological innovation.
And yet the bulk of the recommendations in “Post-Partisan Power” are valuable contributions to the energy debate. The authors clearly understand the importance of fostering innovation. Brookings’ Mark Muro, in particular, is a leading advocate for a cluster-based perspective on energy innovation.
While it would be a shame for the release of this paper to dampen the chances of putting a price on carbon, so too would it be a shame to let broad agreement on the importance of energy innovation go to waste.
Policymakers need to recognize the challenge, opportunity and necessity of energy innovation. If “Post-Partisan Power” helps further that recognition, it will have been a success.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.