September 29th, 2010

Let’s Build a Movement… But Which One?

BOSTON -

Back in January, Chris wrote a post on the difference in framing between “greentech,” “cleantech”, and “enertech”.  In reference to Bob Metcalfe’s preferred “enertech”, Chris writes:

Metcalfe’s perspective is interesting but I think it misses the point, “green” and “clean” are more than just about energy.  It’s about food, building materials, toxins, yadda yadda yadda.”

I was reminded of that when I read this post by David Roberts of Grist, arguing that “environmentalism”, as a movement, just isn’t equipped to deal with climate change.  Writes Roberts,

“A clear understanding of that challenge renders comically absurd the notion that it can or should be the province of a niche progressive interest group. It’s just too big for that.”

Continue Reading >

Tagged cleantech, david roberts, enertech, greentech, metcalfe, Sustainability |

January 22nd, 2010

What’s your Opinion? Green Tech VS. Clean Tech VS. ‘EnerTech’?

BOSTON -

A couple weeks ago, I was sent this article by a friend: Metcalfe brings VC perspective to Alternative Energy. Metcalfe is an interesting guy that has a great perspective. I skimmed through it and this part really popped out at me: “Networking isn’t the only goal Metcalfe’s been using to try to change people’s thinking on energy technology. “Green” has been politicized, he says, and its anti-business stigma is an impediment. Rather than “green tech,” or “cleantech,” Metcalfe’s been beating a drum for adoption of the term, “enertech.”

I agree with Metcalfe that “Green” has been politicized and tends to divide people even though everyone agrees with the principles (i.e. no one likes to get cancer and thus dislikes the things that cause it). I’ve tended to use the term “clean Tech” in the past because I feel it frames the issue nicely (something Republicans have long been good at, and no I’m not a Democrat either) in terms of clean versus dirty. If something isn’t clean, it must be dirty and that’s bad. Easy to understand. Metcalfe’s perspective is interesting but I think it misses the point, “green” and “clean” are more than just about energy. It’s about food, building materials, toxins, yadda yadda yadda. It’s also possible that he understands this but simply feels “enerTech” will be a more useful name due to the politicization of the two other words.

But I really think this one is still up for debate and I want to hear what you think. Which terms do you use and why?

Tagged alternative energy, clean tech, enertech, green tech, metcalfe, VC |

January 5th, 2010

Clean Tech Tuesday from Boston: New Solar Incentives, FloDesign, VCs, Smart Grid

Uncategorized -

Clean Tech Tuesdays was started last week (on a Saturday) after I noticed that I skim through Boston area news about once a week to keep up to date on whats happening. Every week, or every couple of weeks depending on how much news there is we’ll will share with you stories we find the most interesting.

Please share your stories or thoughts in the comments section or via twitter #cleantechtuesday.

Here’s the best:

Continue Reading >

Tagged flodesign, metcalfe, smart grid, solar incentives, steven chu |